A neighborhood where inhabitants trust each other and monitor the activities of youth is described as having which attribute?

A neighborhood where inhabitants trust each other and monitor the activities of youth is described as having which attribute?

• A. Low levels of violence
• B. Strong access to resources
• C. High collective efficacy
• D. High levels of wealth

Answer: (C)

Trust among neighbors and watching over youth reflect a community’s collective efficacy. This concept captures both social cohesion—the sense that residents care about each other—and informal social control—the willingness and ability to intervene to keep youth and the community safe. When people feel connected and ready to supervise or intervene as needed, problems don’t have room to escalate, which is why such a neighborhood is described as having high collective efficacy. Weighing the other options, wealth or resource access aren’t what’s being described here; they’re about material capital rather than how people relate and act together. And while lower violence can result from strong collective efficacy, the scenario’s defining feature is the social process of trust and proactive supervision, not economic wealth.

Trust among neighbors and watching over youth reflect a community’s collective efficacy. This concept captures both social cohesion—the sense that residents care about each other—and informal social control—the willingness and ability to intervene to keep youth and the community safe. When people feel connected and ready to supervise or intervene as needed, problems don’t have room to escalate, which is why such a neighborhood is described as having high collective efficacy.

Weighing the other options, wealth or resource access aren’t what’s being described here; they’re about material capital rather than how people relate and act together. And while lower violence can result from strong collective efficacy, the scenario’s defining feature is the social process of trust and proactive supervision, not economic wealth.