Which statement about immigrant adolescents is supported by the material?

Which statement about immigrant adolescents is supported by the material?

• A. Immigrant adolescents have worse outcomes than US-born peers
• B. Immigrant adolescents have outcomes identical to US-born peers
• C. Immigrant adolescents have better outcomes than adolescents living in their native countries
• D. Immigrant adolescents have better mental health and school performance than US-born peers

Answer: (D)

Outcomes of immigrant adolescents relative to their US-born peers is the idea being tested. The material often shows that immigrant youths do at least as well as, and sometimes better than, their US-born peers in mental health and school performance. This pattern is known as the immigrant paradox: despite facing economic and acculturative challenges, many immigrant adolescents benefit from protective factors like strong family support, high value placed on education, and close-knit communities, which can translate into better engagement in school and fewer mental health problems on average. So why this option fits best is that it reflects the evidence that, in many contexts, immigrant adolescents show advantages in the areas mentioned. The other statements aren’t consistently supported by the material: the evidence does not reliably show worse outcomes than US-born peers, nor does it claim identical outcomes across groups; and it does not generally assert that immigrant youths outperform adolescents in their home countries—focus is typically on comparisons with US-born peers.

Outcomes of immigrant adolescents relative to their US-born peers is the idea being tested. The material often shows that immigrant youths do at least as well as, and sometimes better than, their US-born peers in mental health and school performance. This pattern is known as the immigrant paradox: despite facing economic and acculturative challenges, many immigrant adolescents benefit from protective factors like strong family support, high value placed on education, and close-knit communities, which can translate into better engagement in school and fewer mental health problems on average.

So why this option fits best is that it reflects the evidence that, in many contexts, immigrant adolescents show advantages in the areas mentioned. The other statements aren’t consistently supported by the material: the evidence does not reliably show worse outcomes than US-born peers, nor does it claim identical outcomes across groups; and it does not generally assert that immigrant youths outperform adolescents in their home countries—focus is typically on comparisons with US-born peers.